|
As the people rallying in large numbers over recent weeks in South
Australia are being correctly informed, the root-cause of the problem
with the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) is neither drought nor climate
change: it is man-made. The MDB is being mismanaged and water has been
over-allocated by governments.
The member governments of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG)
are behaving as if there is no crisis, no drought, no disaster evolving
in the Lower Lakes and the Coorong and it is business as usual.
The previous Howard Government's Management Investment Schemes has
resulted in corporations buying up scarce water to establish new
irrigation projects during the peak of the drought; the Queensland
Government in 2007 tried to auction water licenses in the Warrego River
until it was stopped by the Howard Government; the NSW Government until
very recently (3/7/08) stood idly by while up stream farmers stole and
diverted water from the Murray Darling; the Darling is bone dry, the
Menindee Lakes have experienced significant problems with water quality
(salinity) that has had major impacts on the citizens of Broken Hill
and their plumbing systems (ABC TV Stateline South Australia 8/8/2008)
In Victoria, the Brumby Government is planning to pipe 75 GL (1 giga
litre = 1 billion litres) of water per year from the Goulburn River to
Melbourne and is ignoring calls from its own farmers for a moratorium
to be placed on permanent water trade out of the district of origin,
during what has been a long and protracted drought (4/7/08). It is also
planning to build a 150 GL desalination plant in Bass to alleviate Melbourne's
water problems. The South Australian Government is planning to build a
weir at Wellington and for the first time in their history cut off the
Lower Lakes from freshwater.
Not surprisingly, opposition is increasing amongst South
Australians and Victorians living in these regions. On 10th August
2008, around 10,000 people attended a rally at Goolwa on one of the
coldest Sunday mornings of the year and the numbers attending South
Australian rallies continue to grow.
State of Emergency Needs to Called
Also correct is the need for a State of Emergency to be declared
across the entire MDB to ensure the viability of the entire river
system, given the neglect by state and federal governments and to
address the consequences of a drought that is far from over. Those who
rallied on the steps of the South Australian Parliament on 1st August 2008
were told of the need to be prepared to fight for the Murray Darling as
was done to save the Franklin River. For too long the MDB has been
treated a reservoir and not as a living natural system of water
environments that need conservation.
Royal Commission Required
There is however a desperate need for the systemic causes of the
neglect, mismanagement, over-allocation and market-based water reforms
to be investigated and determined before making long term changes to
the governance of the MDB and for that the new Federal Government needs
to show leadership and call a public Commission of Inquiry, a Royal
Commission.
Clearly there are choices that need to be made if there is not
enough water to go around, particularly in times of drought. These are
not choices that can be made by markets or politically independent
national bodies established to support those markets; they must be made
by government using political processes. The choices that need to be
made are that the river and domestic needs must rank ahead of export needs.
All high security water must be reserved for domestic needs, and
choices must be made to give priority to households that depend upon
river water and irrigators who put food on the table of Australians.
The advocates of reform such as the Wentworth Group promote the use
of markets to manage water and to rely on a politically-independent
body ? both ideas are ill conceived and result from the idea that
governments are incapable and markets are the only ones that can be
trusted i.e. the tired privatisation agenda is the only viable
solution, water must go to the most efficient (economic) user who can
afford to pay, irrespective of the consequences, and because we are in
a crisis we must act now.
COAG and Market Privatisation by Stealth
Those who support water reform have been careful not to use the
privatisation word and accordingly the public have not been told the
truth by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) that their water
reforms are about enhancing the market privatisation of the waters of
the MDB. What was once a licence, granted to a property owner by a
state government to extract a quantity of water from the MDB, has been
unbundled into a marketable property right that can be owned by anybody
with the capital to purchase or a bank to hold as a mortgage.
These licences were not sold by state governments in the first
place; the amount of water that a licensee can access as an allocation
is controlled by state governments and needs to be charged for, given
the considerable public and continuing investment in the infrastructure
of the MDB, to recover a fair share of costs of the public
infrastructure. It remains unclear to me how Australian governments
achieved this monumental theft without the prior approval of the
Australian electorate via a referendum, supported by subsequent changes
to the Australian Constitution; this is truly an economic rationalist
experiment on a grand scale.
COAG therefore is not a solution to our problems, but one of the
causes. It was a COAG meeting in 1994 that decided to establish an open
market or free trade in river water, instead of immediately addressing
the over-allocation of water and establishing policies for its use,
such as giving priority to maintaining the health of the river system
and putting domestic needs ahead of export markets. COAG meetings are
not open to the public or recorded in Hansard as they should be.
Snowy Mountains Scheme Privatisation
Let us not forget that the Howard Government supported by the NSW
and Victorian state governments tried to privatise the Snowy Mountain
Scheme including its waters in 2006, but John Howard backed down in the
face of a massive backlash by farmers, environmentalists and unions.
The Australian website reported 2/08/08 that "The head of the Snowy
Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme has launched a new campaign to
privatise the authority in a move that could reignite a fierce battle
between the Hydro and farmers, environmentalists and unions." This is
cause for considerable concern.
The Howard Government also introduced farm-based managed investment
schemes which have been labelled as a 'disgrace' by South Australia's
Water Security Minister (The Australian 25/7/08) for distorting
agricultural markets. These schemes are purely self-serving for their
investors and where MDB water has been purchased by these corporations
they are currently free to use the purchased water to produce products
for overseas markets. COAG has used the new water market to expand the
irrigation industry during one the most significant droughts in our
recent history. Something is seriously wrong when those with money can
buy whatever water they need whilst the rest of us, including the river
system, have to go without or put in place expensive desalination
plants with their considerable environmental baggage. Australians must
control the waters of the MDB for the common good and not corporations,
private investors or free trade agreements.
The establishment of a national, politically-independent body,
advocated by the water reform movement, is no solution as in whose
interest is this body going to serve and how is this body going to be
accountable to the people of Australia? Handing control to the Federal
Government is also not a solution for as we have seen it can't be
trusted to make the right decision let alone represent the people of
South Australia with its limited representation in the House of
Representatives compared to the eastern states.
Former South Australian Premier Don Dunstan would never have
allowed the management of the Murray Darling to allow the Lower Lakes
and the Coorong to dry up. He must be turning in his grave given COAG's
priority to establish water trading as a management solution. The
Australian Editorial 5/8/2008 pointed out that 5,300 billion litres
(5,300 GL) was diverted from the MDB in 2006-7 for farming, town and
other uses was the lowest in a quarter of a century due to the severity
of the drought. COAG has failed to ensure the Murray Darling gets a
fair share of water to conserve the river as intended by our founding
fathers in section 100 of the Australian Constitution.
Federal Government's Competition Policy
The market reform agenda was forced on states by the Commonwealth
under the guise of Competition Policy in the mid 90's and none of the
parties, including the media, involved in supporting water reform have
been brave enough to explain to the Australian people that establishing
a market in river water is privatisation. It also explains why progress
has been so slow and neither the government nor the reform movement
have initiated a public inquiry such as a Royal Commission or sought
the democratic authority to establish a market to enhance the privatisation
of the water of the Murray Darling. It is being done by stealth by the
reform movement without publicly surfacing what is precisely wrong with
current policies, management arrangements and governing laws.
In these circumstances a Royal Commission must be held to determine
what is wrong with the management of the MDB and its governance and to
make recommendations to address the problems even if that requires
changing the Australian Constitution.
Apart from the NSW Government's $105 million RiverBank scheme as
far as I am aware state governments have not purchased water from the
Murray Darling because clause 100 of the Australian Constitution
bestows water rights to the states and the state governments license
the use of river water and regulate its use. Why purchase what you own,
control and whose flow depends upon the vagaries of the climate? The
NSW Government's RiverBank scheme purchase of "water access licenses"
underscores the point, why is it purchasing a water access license it
granted in the first place?
The Rudd government is the first Australian Government in history
to purchase river water in 2008 and presumably is using clause 51
(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution to overcome clause 100 now that a
water market is operating between states. The Commonwealth is
purchasing water licenses from "willing sellers" within a state and not
from state governments. The whole idea of purchasing water from
"willing sellers" lacks any strategic focus on the part of governments
as to what purpose the water was being used, its reliability (security)
and whether it is being used to serve domestic or overseas markets.
There is a risk the wrong water is being purchased from "willing
sellers". Compensation as part of any structural adjustment of water
allocation needs to be looked at on a case by case basis and be jointly
funded by state and federal governments.
The Queensland government tried to auction water from the Warrego
to the market in 2007, despite the drought, but was eventually stopped
by the Howard Government. The selling of water licences by state
governments also needs to be stopped, as it is another foundation stone
in the market privatisation of the waters of the Murray Darling.
Exporting Water
Professor Randy Stringer of the University of Adelaide recently
pointed out in a University of Adelaide Water Wednesday
(www.water.adelaide.edu.au/events/) lecture on 2/7/08 that Australia
exports a net 4,000 GL of water in agriculture products. This data
comes from 2001 figures on page 137 of Farmhand's "Talking Water"
report 2004. This begs the question of just how much of MDB's water is
being used for export that has been either extracted or prevented from
flowing into the river systems, it is time Australian knew the precise
use of MDB water by all users, again this needs to be a matter
addressed by a Royal Commission.
As recently as 28/6/08 Cubbie Station in Queensland announced that
it plans to expand to grow food crops and wants to capitalise on world
food shortages and high prices. Fair Water Use (Australia) believes the
water storage capacity of the Cubbie Group is around 537 GL of MDB
water. Just 50 GL of water held by the Cubbie Group would save Adelaide
the expense of building a desalination plant! This is an unacceptable
outcome of current water policy and clearly a market solution is not
going to be the answer, as markets can only put self-interest first,
not the collective interests of the rivers and the citizens of
Australia as a whole. This can only be done and must be done by
governments acting for the will of the people.
Alternative Policies and Strategies
At a time when climate change needs to be taken into account,
societies and economies must be redesigned to ensure goods and services
are produced and consumed with the least-possible utilisation of
resources. This means that our food must to be produced as close as
possible to the point of consumption and the needs of local markets
must rank ahead of interstate and export markets. It goes without
saying that looking after the end-to-end health of the Murray Darling
needs to be an absolute priority and the needs of Australian citizens
who directly rely upon its water supply and food production.
If the Federal Government truly has the interests of the Australian
people and MDB at heart they should announce a Royal Commission: an
open and transparent public Commission of Inquiry into the management
of the MDB, including water withheld from the river (public and
private), ground water, category of water use (type of crop to meet a
domestic or export market), the health and environmental condition of
dependent ecosystems, the impact and consequences of water reform, and
current governance. It should also propose policies and actions that
must be adopted by governments to address Australia's cyclic weather
patterns and the consequences of climate change.
Given the current state of affairs, COAG needs to think carefully
and begin the redemption process by declaring a State of Emergency in
the MDB. A moratorium must be placed on water trading during this
period. The reliance on the water market is not a substitute for
effective water policy designed to secure the health and competitive
position of Australians given climate change.
Effective water policy necessitates the states assuming control of
all water, including that withheld from the Murray Darling by private
interests and ground water, for the remainder of the drought and until
such time as the Federal Government Royal Commission reports. COAG must
direct the Murray Darling Basin Commission and regional water
management bodies to implement emergency measures as follows:
- Critical domestic needs are put first to focus on sustaining the health and conservation of the Murray Darling system.
- Irrigators are able to meet the needs of Australians for food at an
affordable price both now and in the future that enhances Australian's
competitive position against imports i.e. like all costs the cost of
water needs to be kept as low as possible.
- Reallocating water based upon domestic needs first
(high-reliability water) and export use second (low-reliability water),
taking into account the inherent variability of Australia's climate.
- Agricultural and industry pursuits must be appropriate given water
availability and taking into account not only economic but
environmental impact and climate change.
- All other options for sourcing and effectively using water are
thoroughly researched and developed to improve the range of available
options in times of severe drought and to ensure appropriate use of
water in the good times.
- A Drought/Disaster Management Master Plan needs to be established for the MDB that addresses the above principles.
State
governments of both political persuasions have been part of the reform
movement since the mid-nineties and, given the current crisis
precipitated by drought, have jumped to building expensive desalination
plants, and pipe-line projects, without addressing the issue of
mismanagement and over-allocation of our rivers, setting fair policies
for water use and thoroughly investigating alternative options for
water resources and their efficient use.
In Victoria the Bass Shire Council passed a motion on the 18th June
2008 "That this Council, informed by its research and investigation,
believes the Government?s decision to commit to a desalination plant at
Williamson?s Beach should be reversed. Council calls on the Premier,
Hon. John Brumby MP, and the Victorian State Government, to abandon the
decision to construct a desalination plant and to instead hold a
comprehensive, open and transparent inquiry into options for Victoria?s
water supply. Council believes that the outcome of such an inquiry
should inform future Government decisions."
The best form of a comprehensive, open and transparent inquiry is
to hold a Royal Commission. South Australia also needs to hold a Royal
Commission to examine the water resources available to it and whether a
desalination plant is justified as an economic and environmentally
viable solution for Adelaide given the outcome of a Royal Commission
into the MDB.
John E. Caldecott
Henley Beach SA
15th August 2008
References & Further Information
ABC Landline "The future of Managed
Investment Schemes" 25th February 2007
http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2006/s1853485.htm
ABC News "Aust breaching Ramsar wetlands deal: water expert" 11th
August 2008 (Associate Professor David Paton, of Adelaide University)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/08/11/2330550.htm
ABC News "Cubbie expansion sparks
Murray-Darling fears" 28th June 2008
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/28/2288704.htm
ABC News "Govt grilled on
Murray-Darling rescue plan" 15th August 2008
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/08/15/2335992.htm
ABC News "Lawyer raises doubts over
water unbundling legislation" 2nd October 2007
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/02/2048378.htm
ABC News "Paroo satellite snaps anger
Murray-Darling farmers" 15th August 2008
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/08/15/2336025.htm
ABC Radio PM "Murray River in need of
more water" 26th September 2003
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2003/s954742.htm
Australia's Gateway to Irrigation
Information "Buying and Selling"
http://www.irrigate.net.au/water_trading/buying_selling/index.shtml
Bass Shire Council "Bass Coast walks
from Desalination Plant" 20th March 2008
http://www.basscoast.vic.gov.au/content/content.asp?cnid=3724&ctid=
Blue Planet Project Global Campaign (Canadian) for "Water
Justice" (Maude Barlow is author of Blue Covenant)
http://www.blueplanetproject.net/
Conservation Council of South Australia "Save
the Murray" campaign:
http://www.ccsa.asn.au
Council of Australian Governments "COAG
website"
http://www.coag.gov.au/
Country News "Investing in Water
Savings ? A Goulburn System Project":
http://www.countrynews.com.au/GoulburnSystemProject.asp
Dissent No 27 Spring 2008 Editorial "World
Water Scam"
http://www.dissent.com.au/dissent_27_summary.htm
Fair Water Use (Australia) Campaign "Revive
the Murray-Darling basin"
http://www.fairwateruse.com.au/
Farmhand "Talking Water" 12 Part
Report 2004
http://www.farmhand.org.au/
Goulburn-Murray Water
http://www.g-mwater.com.au/
Government of South Australia Water Trading
Overview "Water Trading in South Australia"
http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/licensing/trading/index.html
Independent Murray Darling Basin
Commission: Ian Kowalick 30th July 2008
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606
Inland Rivers Network (NSW) Latest news "Help
buy water for Warrego"
http://www.irnnsw.org.au/
Living Murray Submission 129 "For the
Sake of the Murray" S. John Caldecott 11th February 2003
http://xlivingmurray.mdbc.gov.au/__data/page/224/129.pdf
Municipal Association of Victoria "Ratepayers
benefit from $18.1m water unbundling package" 26th September 2007
http://www.mav.asn.au
Murray Darling Basin Commission (latest
issue of the Murray Darling Basin Agreement is June 2006 165 pages)
http://www.mdbc.gov.au/home
Murray Darling Basin Commission Natural
Resource Management "Water Trading" 16th March 2007
http://www.mdbc.gov.au/home
National Conservation Council of NSW "Win
for the Warrego River" circa September 2007
http://nccnsw.org.au
Nature Conservation of NSW "Crack down
on floodplain harvesting a good first step"
http://nccnsw.org.au/index
NSW Government Department of Environment
and Climate Change "Water access
licence purchase (RiverBank)" 24th April 2008
http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/dealings1.shtml
NSW Government Media Release - Department
of Water and Energy "Floodplain Harvesting Policy to Provide Security for
NSW Rivers and Communities" 3rd July 2008
http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/mediarelnr/mr20080703_3902.html
NSW Government Natural Resources "Water access and trade"
http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/licensing.shtml
NSW Government Natural Resources "Water sharing plans"
http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/plans.shtml
NSW Government Natural Resources "Licensing
under the Water Management Act 2000: Dealings in Water"
http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/dealings1.shtml
Parliament of Australia The Senate "The
Australian Constitution"
http://www.aph.gov.au/SEnate/general/constitution/index.htm
Parliament of NSW "Snowy Hydro Corporatisation Bill"
13th November 1997
http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au
Parliament of NSW Minister For Land And
Water Conservation "Motion of Censure" 8th April 1997
http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/PARLMENT
Plug the Pipe Campaign (Victoria) ?
campaigning against plan to pipe 75 GL per year from Goulburn River to
Melbourne.
http://www.plugthepipe.com/
River Lakes and Coorong Action Group Inc.
(RLCAG)
www.riverlakescoorong.com.au
Stop The Weir Campaign (South Australia) ?
campaigning against the South Australian Government's plans to build a weir at
Wellington and block water off from flowing into the Lower Lakes of the Murray.
http://www.stoptheweir.com
The Advertiser (Adelaide) "Save the
Murray" Feature:
http://www.news.com.au
The Advertiser Editorial "Out of
sight, lakes' plight ignored" 8th August 2008
(Calls for a State of Emergency and Royal
Commission)
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow
The Age "Tired of waiting, Howard set
to detonate water bomb" 25th January 2007
http://www.theage.com.au
The Australian "Fresh move to
privatise Snowy Mountains Hydro scheme" 2nd August 2008
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au
The Australian "Minister attacks
farm-based managed investment schemes as a 'disgrace' 25th July 2008
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story
The Sun Herald "Good harvest for
Managed Investment Schemes" 2 July 2008
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985
The Sun Herald "Managed investment
schemes in return" 1st December 2007
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story
The University of Adelaide Professor Mike
Young "A future-proofed Basin" 2008
http://www.myoung.net.au/water/count.php?para=13
The University of Adelaide Water Research
Cluster Water Events in 2008: The second "Water Wednesday" seminar
was held on 2 July 2008.
http://water.adelaide.edu.au/events/
Victoria Government The Department of
Sustainability and the Environment Victoria Water Register "Unbundling"
http://www.waterregister.vic.gov.au/Public/Unbundling.aspx
Your Water Your Say "Bass Coast Shire
Council?s Motion 18th June 2008" (Against Desalination in Victoria)
http://www.yourwateryoursay.org/2008/06/19
Your Water Your Say Campaign (Victoria) ?
campaigning against the Victorian's Governments plans to build a 150 GL
Desalination Plant in Bass.
http://www.yourwateryoursay.org/
Revision History
Article dated 14/8/2008 provided to Senator Hon John Faulkner at the Hallett Cove Community Cabinet Meeting.
Article dated 15/8/2008 (-1) Para "The advocates of reform ?" revised and ABC News Links added (x2) dated 15/8/2008. General edits to improve syntax for posting on http://www.fairwateruse.com.au/ |