|
Murray-Darling mismanagement: Here we go again |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 21 August 2008 |
|
MEDIA RELEASE
Yesterday's attempt by the
Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water to justify the dramatic
increase in extractions from the headwaters of the Darling by stating that that
much of the Queensland water "breaks out into floodplains or alternatively feeds
into terminal wetlands resulting in a great loss of this water", exemplifies the
magnitude of the problem facing the Murray-Darling as a direct result of its
mismanagement.
"These comments once again raise
major concerns about the level of understanding of water dynamics possessed by
the very institutions responsible for the management of the Murray-Darling",
Fair Water Use Coordinator, Dr Ian Douglas was reported as saying today.
He added "As long as water
authorities either fail to comprehend or ignore the complex and vital relationship
between surface-water, wet-lands, groundwater, aquifers and river health, the
future for the Murray-Darling is grim".
"This is a totally unacceptable
situation which re-emphasises the need for the Federal Government to call a
State of Emergency, assume immediate control of the entire Basin and put an end
to the state-based exploitation which has brought the system to its knees", Dr
Douglas concluded. |
|
|
Tuesday, 19 August 2008 |
|
MEDIA RELEASE
Recent
comments from those involved in large-scale irrigation enterprises in the
Murray-Darling Basin seem to suggest that the nation should not be concerned
about their activities as they are currently growing more grains and less
cotton and rice.
This
would be fine and dandy if it signalled a "Damascus road" conversion on their
part with respect to their understanding of the impacts of their actions. Sadly
it is clear that, irrespective of crop selection, most agribusinesses will
continue to extract from the river system as much water as they are able, under
the terms of their current, untenable allocation arrangements.
Despite
the visionary statements and other platitudes which emanate from this sector,
it would appear that responsibilities to the environment and downstream users
will still come a distant second to the demands of the balance sheet.
The
new Murray-Darling Basin Authority is not due to present its "Basin Plan" until
2011 and there is no firm time-frame for its implementation.
Trend
data is overwhelming: the Murray-Darling cannot tolerate a further three years
or more of rampant abuse. If its immediate future is left in the hands of those
with vested interests, could a major product of the region soon be tumble-weed?
In
line with an increasing body of expert opinion, and to allay the frustrations
of those currently considering filing a class action against the Federal
Government, Fair Water Use calls upon the Prime Minister to declare a
state of emergency and assume total and immediate control of all Murray-Darling
water.
|
|
|
Privately held water: Save it for a rainy day |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 14 August 2008 |
|
MEDIA RELEASE
Fair
Water Use welcomes
yesterday?s announcement that the Federal Government is now seeking to purchase
large irrigation enterprises and associated water licences in the Murray-Darling
Basin and applauds the urgent independent audit which was also promised at the
Community Cabinet meeting in South Australia.
However
concerns still exist about the depth of Government understanding of the problem
and available treatments.
On
leaving the meeting in Hallett Cove last night national coordinator, Ian
Douglas, stated that Senator Wong?s playing down of the merits of purchasing
water currently held in the upper Darling suggested that once again she had been
poorly advised by the Murray-Darling Basin Commission: ?Her concerns that
transmission losses will be up to 80% are ill-founded as Fair Water Use is not asking that water be
released from the northern Darling at this time,? Dr Douglas
said.
He
continued, ?Water acquired in northern NSW and southern Queensland should not be
released into the dry bed of the upper Darling River, but should be used as
collateral to enable the immediate release of at least 300 gigalitres from the
Menindee Lakes into the lower Darling. As 200 megalitres per day is currently
being discharged from the Lakes, the Darling below Menindee is in flow. The
required water bolus would therefore reach the Murray with little
being lost in transit. Fair Water Use
urges the Government to acquire any available strategic properties
irrespective of their location?.
He went
on to say that the Federal Government ?debt? would be repaid when the currently
dry upper reaches of the Darling started to flow again after summer rains,
enabling water to be transferred from purchased properties into the Menindee
Lakes with minimal transmission losses.
Dr
Douglas added, ?The promised water audit will only be of value if it clearly
defines the volume of water in public storages that is not allocated for
critical human needs?.
|
|
|
Fact-finding mission incriminates Murray-Darling water hoarders |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 13 August 2008 |
|
MEDIA RELEASE
On national
television yesterday, coordinator Ian Douglas indicated that a Fair Water
Use team, currently in the Upper Darling on a fact-finding mission, has
confirmed reports that the Darling River is dry above Wilcannia, whilst, not
far to the west, the Paroo River is flowing strongly.
Dr Douglas stated yesterday that both the upper Darling and Paroo
catchments have largely received above average to well above average rainfall
over the past nine months, and added that the Paroo is the only significant
river in the region that is free from major dams and diversions. These findings
tend to refute, for once and for all, the mantra emanating from those involved
in water interception in the region, that they have insignificant impacts on
flows into the Murray-Darling system. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Murray-Darling Basin Commission: guardians or executioners of the river system? |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 08 August 2008 |
|
MEDIA RELEASE
Reported comments today from the
MDBC, that Government purchase of large irrigation enterprises would have no
impact on turning around the lamentable demise of the river system, raises
profound and disturbing questions as to the commission?s understanding of the
causes and short and long term implications of the current water
crisis.
Fair Water Use coordinator, Dr Ian
Douglas, responded to the statement, saying that in failing to support the ACF /
IRN proposal, already approved by representatives of at least one of the
identified properties, the Commission appeared to be acting in a manner
detrimental to the Murray?Darling as a whole.
He added that concerns must exist
about the quality and impartiality of the advice the Commission receives from
groups such as its Community Advisory Committee, membership of which is known to
include representatives from large irrigating enterprises.
Dr Douglas indicated that Fair
Water Use has
contacted the Commission requesting clarification of their stance
on Government acquisition of irrigation properties. |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
|
| Results 19 - 27 of 38 |